Comments for Nicholas Orr

Comment on nginx (engine X) - What a Pain in the BUM! [13: Permission denied] by Kyle

Kyle — Thu, 26 Aug 2010 08:46:59 +0000

The problem is that nginx requires the whole tree to be readable and not just where your root starts in nginx.conf. So “chmod -R 777 /var” would be the brute force solution.

The reason running nginx as site fixed it for you is probably because site was the owner for /var.

Comment on La Dolce Vita by Pat Mesiti by all natural face cream

all natural face cream — Fri, 06 Aug 2010 17:12:09 +0000

Nice sharing your experiences here. Do stay in touch and keep posting.

Comment on nginx (engine X) - What a Pain in the BUM! [13: Permission denied] by Nicholas Orr

Nicholas Orr — Sat, 10 Jul 2010 04:29:48 +0000

If you don't have a default doc specified you should be able to specify it
and it should work. I couldn't even do that…

Thanks for the to though ;)

Comment on nginx (engine X) - What a Pain in the BUM! [13: Permission denied] by Lupinedev

Lupinedev — Sat, 10 Jul 2010 04:27:03 +0000

I know this is old but just fixed this problem today. check in the nginx conf file for the site. Make sure the location is looking for index.php files

location / {
index index.php index.html;
}

Comment on MS Exchange via Outlook Over VPN by exchange hosting

exchange hosting — Wed, 19 May 2010 07:24:47 +0000

………..

Comment on [SOLVED] nginx + php (fastcgi) + win32 = “No input file specified” by balinder

balinder — Sat, 13 Feb 2010 20:35:07 +0000

Has anyone been able to get windows binary of ngnix working in a production environment?

Comment on Use git To Manage Joomla Templates by hostforjoomla

hostforjoomla — Wed, 30 Dec 2009 09:48:58 +0000

Thanks, this is very useful

Comment on Hoyts IMAX is a Rip Off by Nicholas Orr

Nicholas Orr — Fri, 25 Dec 2009 17:38:36 +0000

Yeah I agree on technical grounds that effort and cost are involved.
However from the non-technical movie goer point of view that I've taken with the above comments, it is a whole lot of money for something that doesn't live upto expectations. It occurs to me as part of the progression that is seeing movies in a cinema and therefore should be the same price as every other cinema.

I went to see Avatar at the Cineplex owned Southbank 5 cinemas on Monday the 21st Dec it cost me $6.50!! The screen is 25m, MASSIVE, the sound was great - now paying $22 at EQ for an “IMAX” experience is just a waste of money…. The 338% increase in cost of seeing it at EQ Hoyts IMAX does not equal a 338% increase in movie experience….

It is all about emersion, nothing emerses me more than a whopping huge screen in a massive theater…

Thanks for stopping by :)

Comment on Hoyts IMAX is a Rip Off by greeney

greeney — Fri, 25 Dec 2009 17:29:21 +0000

It's still IMAX because it uses 72mm film opposed to 36mm. It has a different aspect ratio to conventional cinemas, also there is a lot more money that goes behind an IMAX cinema, you'd be surprised at how many cinemas use THX certified equipment but you just don't know it.

Comment on Stupid Bloody Intel S5000XVN BIOS!! by robbyt

robbyt — Sun, 22 Nov 2009 11:16:28 +0000

Read the release notes for the bios update.